6 Apr 2016
RIGA, Feb 22-23 (2016): Identifying the Political
Appearances of the Political had a nice start (1/6) in Riga with IDENTIFYING THE POLITICAL. Conceptual Analysis: Rhetoric, Poetics and Populist Talk in Contemporary Politics. It was held in the main building of University of Latvia (Raiņa bulvāris 19). Our partners, scholar Pauls Daija, dean Dace Balode, and the Faculty of Theology at the University made us very happy by being great in both dialogue and infra-structure.
The sessions were held February 22-23, 2016 and the program can be found here. The weather was fine (for the Northern Hemisphere) and we had a public / participatory group between 25 and 30 throughout the seminar, two great dinners and a couple of nice lunches at the university's own canteen.
After the Summer session in Orivesi July 2016 - see CFP here (Raine Vasquez will take Max's role here) - we will organize a winter session together with the International Relations and Human Rights circle run by Olga Breskaya and Mogens Chrom Jakobsen next winter in St. Petersburg. More info coming in the fall!
We are also negotiating about becoming one event in the next Biennale of Athens. Thumbs up!
5 Feb 2016
Program
program
IDENTIFYING THE POLITICAL
Conceptual Analysis: Rhetoric, Poetics and Populist Talk in Contemporary Politics
Appearances of the Political 1/6
Winter Symposium: February 22-23, 2016, University of Latvia (Main Building, Raiņa bulvāris 19) in collaboration with University of Latvia
Monday 22 Feb
9.00-10.30 Welcome, presentation of seminar, circle, NSU, participants
10.00-10.30 Johanne Aarup Hansen, The political aspects of form
10.30-10.45 Break
10.45-11.15 Eret Talviste, The Appearance of the Political in Fictional and Non-Fictional Peripheral Areas
11.20-11.50 Raine Vasquez, Challenges in Outlining the Possibility for a Political Art
11.55-12.25 Laine Kristberga, The Unnoticed Art in Latvia: Pantomimes, Happenings and Carnivals
12.25-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.00 Corinna Casi, Political Decisions in Landscape Choices: How the choice of a landscape or a natural species can be political?
14.05-14.45 Minna Heikinaho, The body relates with other and begin to speak. The author is not required (outside)
14.45-15.00 Break
15.00-15.30 Henrik Juel, A Study in the Rhetoric of the TV-camera – How powerful political figures are being presented on TV and video
15.35-16.05 Sergei Kruk & Ilva Skulte, Disappearance of the political. Computer analysis of Latvian parliamentary discourse
16.10-16.40 Valdis Teraudkalns, Performing morality: recent debates on values in Latvia
16.45- Conclusions, comments, chatting
Tuesday 23 Feb
9.00-9.30 Reflections on yesterday
9.30-10.00 Ott Puumeister, The original finitude of the population and the discourse of survival
10.30-10.45 Break
10.45-11.15 Max Ryynänen, Could political concepts be studied as aesthetic concepts?
11.20-11.50 Nils S. Konstantinovs, Catchers in the Rye: The Politics of Childhood. Constructing Image of a Child in Latvian Political Discourse
11.55-12.25 Carsten Friberg, The End of Enlightenment? – Or, how did academia loose its ideals?
12.25-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.00 Bill Thompson, Solipsism as a Research Method
14.05-14.45 Ann Mirjam Vaikla, Endeavour of Remembrance Descriptive. Investigation of the phenomenon memorial
14.45-15.00 Break
15.00-15.30 Marija Semjonova, Searching for Woman Face of the Age of Perestroika: Sofi Oksanen’s “Stalin’s Cows” (2003)
15.35-16.05 Olga Petrova
Possible security and economic consequences for the European countries during the migration process from the Middle East
16.10- Conclusion
IDENTIFYING THE POLITICAL
Conceptual Analysis: Rhetoric, Poetics and Populist Talk in Contemporary Politics
Appearances of the Political 1/6
Winter Symposium: February 22-23, 2016, University of Latvia (Main Building, Raiņa bulvāris 19) in collaboration with University of Latvia
Monday 22 Feb
9.00-10.30 Welcome, presentation of seminar, circle, NSU, participants
10.00-10.30 Johanne Aarup Hansen, The political aspects of form
10.30-10.45 Break
10.45-11.15 Eret Talviste, The Appearance of the Political in Fictional and Non-Fictional Peripheral Areas
11.20-11.50 Raine Vasquez, Challenges in Outlining the Possibility for a Political Art
11.55-12.25 Laine Kristberga, The Unnoticed Art in Latvia: Pantomimes, Happenings and Carnivals
12.25-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.00 Corinna Casi, Political Decisions in Landscape Choices: How the choice of a landscape or a natural species can be political?
14.05-14.45 Minna Heikinaho, The body relates with other and begin to speak. The author is not required (outside)
14.45-15.00 Break
15.00-15.30 Henrik Juel, A Study in the Rhetoric of the TV-camera – How powerful political figures are being presented on TV and video
15.35-16.05 Sergei Kruk & Ilva Skulte, Disappearance of the political. Computer analysis of Latvian parliamentary discourse
16.10-16.40 Valdis Teraudkalns, Performing morality: recent debates on values in Latvia
16.45- Conclusions, comments, chatting
Tuesday 23 Feb
9.00-9.30 Reflections on yesterday
9.30-10.00 Ott Puumeister, The original finitude of the population and the discourse of survival
10.30-10.45 Break
10.45-11.15 Max Ryynänen, Could political concepts be studied as aesthetic concepts?
11.20-11.50 Nils S. Konstantinovs, Catchers in the Rye: The Politics of Childhood. Constructing Image of a Child in Latvian Political Discourse
11.55-12.25 Carsten Friberg, The End of Enlightenment? – Or, how did academia loose its ideals?
12.25-13.30 Lunch
13.30-14.00 Bill Thompson, Solipsism as a Research Method
14.05-14.45 Ann Mirjam Vaikla, Endeavour of Remembrance Descriptive. Investigation of the phenomenon memorial
14.45-15.00 Break
15.00-15.30 Marija Semjonova, Searching for Woman Face of the Age of Perestroika: Sofi Oksanen’s “Stalin’s Cows” (2003)
15.35-16.05 Olga Petrova
Possible security and economic consequences for the European countries during the migration process from the Middle East
16.10- Conclusion
20 Sept 2015
CFP
Forms of
Appearances of the Political in Contemporary Democracies 1/6
IDENTIFYING
THE POLITICAL
Conceptual
Analysis: Rhetoric, Poetics and Populist Talk in Contemporary Politics
University of Latvia (Main Building, Raiņa bulvāris 19). February 22-23, 2016.
The Nordic
Summer University (NSU) study group Forms of Appearances of the Political in
Contemporary Democracies announces a CFP for its winter symposium. The first session
of the group will be organized in cooperation
with the Latvian University in Riga, Latvia.
The topic, Identifying
the Political, will address the verbal play and its connection to physical
presences of today’s political reality and approach it from the point of view
of social, artistic, aesthetic and cultural analysis.
By focusing
on the conceptual base of the appearances of the political we wish to
articulate clearly the artistic, aesthetic and cultural forces underlying today’s
political thinking. We also want to inaugurate a debate on the role of cultural
approaches in political analysis. To really discuss the political we need to
establish a deeper understanding of the key concepts and their cultural
extensions before elaborating on other forms of investigating them.
This could,
for example, be related to the impact of concepts like migration
/ refugee. What cultural significance do these (or any similar politically
explosive) concepts anchor to?
We wish to
break new paths in connecting the cultural humanities and the political
sciences. This symposium thus invites the participants to explore bravely new
ways of studying the issue. We believe that experimentation is crucial for rethinking the political.
Our partner in the winter session 2016 is the University of Latvia in Riga and we collaborate closely with Pauls Daija, Institute of Literature, Folklore and Art & the Faculty of Theology.
Our partner in the winter session 2016 is the University of Latvia in Riga and we collaborate closely with Pauls Daija, Institute of Literature, Folklore and Art & the Faculty of Theology.
About the
Study Group
The intention
of Forms of Appearances of the Political in Contemporary Democracies is to
create a platform for future collaborations and applications, and to exchange
knowledge and share common interest. It is important for the group to consult a
variety of fields as broad as possible including political theory, philosophy,
communication, social sciences and cultural studies, and we hope that scholars
from all areas of interest would join us.
Participating
in this first meeting of the group does not imply any obligation for
participating in future meetings. We hope, however, that participants will be
involved in building a strong community on this topic for future activities
reflecting the diversity of interests in the community. Future seminars will
focus on History, Material Culture, Activism, Political Art and Aesthetics in
the Everyday, and Communication. The list of sites for the study circle is
planned to be of the following order: Riga, Orivesi (NSU Summer Camp),
Bratislava, St. Petersburg, Berlin (NSU Summer Camp) and Copenhagen, but changes
and additions might apply. And we are open to any propositions concerning collaboration
partners and sites.
We invite
proposals for presentations addressing different problems relating to this
call. We hope that academicians, artists, students, third sector agents and intellectuals
would participate. Please don’t hesitate to ask any questions from the
coordinators!
Format of
presentation can be either:
15 minutes
presentation + 15 minutes discussion
or
30 minutes
presentation + 10 minutes discussion.
Please
indicate your wish in the abstract!
We encourage
you to give an oral presentation, i.e. no dry reading of a paper or reading
from texts on power points (use power points for pictures, illustration of
similar material). What matters is the content and what you have to say, not
the rhetorical performance. Any form of experimental presentation is very much
welcomed.
Submit an
abstract (300-500 words) via e-mail to the coordinators Max Ryynänen &
Carsten Friberg: max.ryynanen@nsuweb.org and/or carsten.friberg@nsuweb.org.
If you wish
to participate without giving a presentation, please write a short (150-300
words) description of yourself.
Deadline of
submitting: November 30, 2015.
The
applications will be viewed ASAP. Applicants will be notified of their acceptance
no later than December 15. Preliminary program will be announced late December 2015.
Later
submission is possible but we will prioritize early submissions.
The
participation fee:
Students,
unemployed and freelancers €30
Baltic
students €10
Others €50.
We will use
the fees to cover some food and other expenses for the participants.
Please
bookmark the blog of the study circle: http://appearancesofthepolitical.blogspot.com.
Link to the
Nordic Summer University here.
18 Sept 2015
Appearances of the Political in
Appearances of the political.
This study circle aims at investigating the aesthetic appearance and the
experiences of the political in contemporary democracies. What form does the
political have today? How do we make sense out of it?
By the political we understand political acts and manifestations in all
forms including not only debates and decisions but also institutional and
material organization as well as communication and actions of everyday living.
The political is thus a wider notion than political institutions and
philosophies; it includes how our everyday is embedded in ideologies forming
our thoughts and actions.
The focus on appearance is a focus on forms in which the political
appears, thus a question of
aesthetics and aestheticization. This, again, covers a wide range of
phenomena fromthe direct use of
aesthetic means in the staging and presentation of politicians and
events of political significance to the
organization of our environment. A central phenomenon is the way the
media aestheticizes politics
making the media the heart of the everyday both for what is said and how
it is said.
This topic is covered by a variety of disciplines such as aesthetics,
rhetoric, communication, material culture studies, anthropology, sociology,
gender studies, pedagogy, and philosophy. The aim of the study circle is to
bring these different disciplines into dialogue based on expertise in each
discipline and the importance of including knowledge from other disciplines.
Full presentation - note the aim is identical
to the short presentation so im case the full presentation os placed after the
short presentation it may not make sense to repeat this part.
Aim of the proposal
This study circle aims at investigating the aesthetic appearance and the
experiences of the political in contemporary democracies. What form does the
political have today? How do we make sense out of it?
By the political we understand political acts and manifestations in all
forms including not only debates and decisions but also institutional and
material organization as well as communication and actions of everyday living.
The political is thus a wider notion than political institutions and
philosophies; it includes how our everyday is embedded in ideologies forming
our thoughts and actions.
The focus on appearance is a focus on forms in which the political
appears, thus a question of
aesthetics and aestheticization. This, again, covers a wide range of
phenomena fromthe direct use of
aesthetic means in the staging and presentation of politicians and
events of political significance to the
organization of our environment. A central phenomenon is the way the
media aestheticizes politics
making the media the heart of the everyday both for what is said and how
it is said.
This topic is covered by a variety of disciplines such as aesthetics,
rhetoric, communication, material culture studies, anthropology, sociology,
gender studies, pedagogy, and philosophy. The aim of the study circle is to
bring these different disciplines into dialogue based on expertise in each
discipline and the importance of including knowledge from other disciplines.
The work of the study circle
Themes of the circle, corresponding to the six seminars:
- Conceptual analysis. The intention of the study circle is to
create a platform for future collaborations and applications. This makes it
crucial to establish a conceptual common ground making explicit the
understanding of key concepts and elaborating on different forms of
investigation to create a platform for sharing common interest and exchanging
of knowledge. It is important for the circle to consult more fields including
political theory, philosophy, communication, social sciences and cultural
studies.
- Historical. For a common platform serves also analysis of 20th
century phenomena. The '60s and '70s displayed a wide range of new forms of
appearances of political activities like, for example, personal appearance in
fashion and anti-fashion including specific styles like punk and fetishizing
expressions of military forms of guerrilla soldiers and freedom fighters. Also
the cold war had many forms of political expressions in both Soviet idea of
political form and free market informed ideology.
- Material culture. Public space is planned and organised in
accordance with particular political ideas, not least of free market and
consume. Functionalist architecture has displayed ideas of educating the modern
citizen while also enhancing specific, unintended, ideas of modern life such as
individualism as goes the Situationist critique.
In similar fashion design contributes to forming physical space in
accordance with ideologies and intentions. Design is important for how we view
space: how it is accessible, hierarchies, limitation of certain actions. Design
is also used for changing actions like forming social and environmental
sustainability.
- Activism. Since the1960s the active forms of the political have
been plural from marches and manifestations over interventions and happenings
to more radical forms like occupations and violent forms such as terrorism. In
recent years we have witnessed a revitalisation of mass movements by use of
internet and social media, creation of new movements like Occupy and
Indignados, and new activities like the hacktivism of Anonymous. In relation to
environment we find guerrilla gardening along with local protests against
corporate use of natural resources engaging people across traditional political
groupings. Many forms of activism also face political resistance defining - or
redefining - the political space threatening democratic rights with agendas of
terrorism challenging or reshape the space for political activism.
- Political arts and aesthetics in the Everyday. The power’s have
always had an alliance with art defining and supporting art as official appearance
of the ruling ideology. This is no less the case today, the powers only have
changed from kings to consensual ideologies in the democracies. At the same
time a whole margin of contemporary art is actually activist, having impact
both in politics and the art world. A possible case to look into is the
Ultracontemporary biennale in Copenhagen 2017. This will be studied with
cooperation with political artists. Artistic research and experimental artistic
work will so meet the already cross-scientific work of the circle, and help to
both mirror it and to provide new alternative ways of looking at the subject.
- Communication. Media have in many ways
changed our ways of communication, both concerning content and form. The use of
social media can be seen as an expansion of the public debate becoming easy
accessible to all, though also changing ethical standards of what can be said
as well as changing discourses from arguments into statements. They are also
operating on terms not known, like algorithms, and becoming a battlefield for
political and economic powers deeply embedded in different forms of control.
Nordic relevance
While there are more individuals and institutions in the Nordic/Baltic
area concerned with studies in topics related to aesthetics and cultural
studies there are, to our knowledge, not an established strategy or even
research groups dedicated to studying the appearances of the political in our
culture combining research from a philosophical/conceptual approach with also
analysis of specific cases using skills of social and human sciences. The big
issue is as well to bring in aesthetic inquiry into the world of politics.
Political engagement and communication is rapidly changing these years.
The Nordic countries have a tradition for an inclusive democracy through
institutions such as unions and NGOs as well as citizen’s groups related to
specific topics. To develop analysis of this forms also an important starting
point for discussing different forms of appearances as well as sharing experiences
between Nordic traditions and other European countries.
The theme of the circle makes is obvious that activities are not only of
interest for researchers but also for a wider public with whom the circle
should aim at having more dialogues both for learning from practice and also
for informing practice.
Methodological considerations for the running of the
study circle
Motivation
The political in democracies seems to become both present in an
increasing plurality of forms as well as to disappear or at least to be emptied
of political content.
Modern media seems, as one example, an invitation to a more widespread
and elaborate appearance of the political offering both access to news and
information as well as participation. Social media has rapidly taken a central
position in many political acts, however also contributing to transforming
political discourses into easy and non-committal opinions. Similar the
political communication is becoming a professionalised activity of political
communication and new-speech where the political debate is more a matter of the
form of presentation than ideas and visions. This contributes to influencing
the participation in the political life and to mistrust in politicians and
political institutions. Parallel to this the public space becomes increasingly
appropriated by consume and market as an ideology forming public space thus
public opinion. Such phenomena could be seen as examples of how the political
debate and awareness is becoming suppressed in western societies.
The motivation of the study-circle is found in experiences of how the
political is made present, in how these forms are developing and transformed,
and in what consequences these forms of appearance have.
Plan
Winter 2016, Riga
Conceptual analysis
Summer 2016
Historical
Winter 2017, Saint Petersburg
Material culture
Summer 2017
Activism
Winter 2018, Tallinn
Political art and aesthetics in the Everyday
Summer 2018
Communication
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



